Cerec inlays
![cerec inlays cerec inlays](https://www.midtowneastdental.com/member_files/object_files/midtowneastdentalarts.com/2016/09/01/cerec4.png)
![cerec inlays cerec inlays](https://www.cadstar.org/sites/default/files/styles/photo_600x600s/public/PIC_6_5.jpg)
EP had statistically higher values than other groups. The mean marginal gap size of EC, LU, EL, and EP were 33.54 µm, 33.77 µm, 34.23 µm, and 85.34 µm, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance for fracture strength data and Kruskal–Wallis for marginal gap data ( ). The fracture strength of specimens was determined at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed until fracture. All samples were subjected to thermocycling. Restorations were cemented with Variolink N and stored in distilled water at 37☌ for 24 hours. Marginal gap measurements were taken with a stereomicroscope. Experimental groups were CO: Intact teeth, EC: IPS e.max CAD and CEREC, LU: Lava Ultimate and CEREC, EL: IPS Empress CAD and CEREC, EP: IPS Empress Esthetic ingots and heat-pressed technique.
#Cerec inlays mod#
60 molars in four groups received MOD inlay preparations. Methods: Seventy-five extracted human mandibular molars were divided randomly into 5 groups ( ). The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate marginal adaptation and fracture strength of inlays produced by CEREC Omnicam using different types of blocs and heat-pressed technique.